My latest book. Click cover.

My latest book. Click cover.
My latest book. Click cover

Wednesday, August 06, 2014


Several years ago, a colleague in the newspaper business said to me, “Like all liberals, you claim to support our troops. Let me ask exactly what you’ve done lately to support them?”
“Well, “ I replied, “unless you went to Afghanistan to personally fight alongside the troops, bought body armor for a soldier in the field or sent a care package with a prepaid calling card, I’ve done the same thing to support them as you conservatives have.”
It occurred to me after the conversation that when all is said and done, there’s always more said than done.

Monday, August 04, 2014


There are none so blind  as those who will not see. After numerous hearings run by Republicans with an unlimited amount of time, the committee studying the Benghazi investigation, has concluded that there was no foul play involved, just a horrible, unavoidable situation: Let's see who is first to declare it fraudulent

Tuesday, June 24, 2014


On the morning my column runs, I can't wait to see what I meant when I wrote it. Some of the interpretations given – most, by anonymous newspaper readers, never cease to amaze me. I am apparently so diabolically clever that I can give a different message to a dozen people with the same 600 words, give or take a few.

When I sit down to see what I actually meant with a particular commentary, I’m always reminded of a story told in a book called “God Caesar: The Writing of Fiction for Beginners” by Vardis Fisher.

It seems a young author had published a book, at some time before 1953 when Fisher wrote about it. The author thought he had written a simple love story, a romance if you will, but a critic for a New York newspaper saw it differently.

The critic, never named by Fisher – in fact, he never gave the book title, either – wrote a sterling review in which he told his readers that novel he had just read was obviously a story of love between two men, disguised as a simple love story because the author didn’t dare tell the real story.

When the author read the critique of his novel, the one he considered to be a simple man-woman romance, he tried to call the critic who refused to speak with him. The author began to write the critic demanding a second review.

After the second or third letter, the critic finally sent the young writer a letter that said something along the lines of, “I won’t redo the review. You are not the first author who wrote a better book than he knew he was writing.”

Maybe the entire matter can best be summed up in this quote from Irish writer, Brendan Behan:  Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how it's done, they've seen it done every day, but they're unable to do it themselves.”


Friday, June 13, 2014


Very often on social media sites, this sentence will pop up:  “You won't see this in the mainstream media.”  This will be followed by a link to a story.   

Out of curiosity, I sometimes check the sources of the story.  Very often, the only source will be a political blog that gives no sources.  When there are no sources, reputable journalists who have to produce sources for the editors watching them, can't write a factual piece about something they cannot prove. 
Once in a while, I do find the source of a story and when all the facts are known the real story has little relationship to what turned up on a political blog.  For instance, such a story turned up on FaceBook last year about a minister who had been arrested for preaching the gospel and asking people to sign a petition to stop the persecution of Christians. 

Eventually, I tracked the story down and a Christian minister had been arrested -- but not for preaching the Gospel.  He had built a church in his back yard, which was in a subdivision, even though he was warned repeatedly with citations that it was a violation of  local building codes and the area was zoned only for single family dwellings. 

He ignored all the citations and started holding services. Eventually, his parishioners grew in number and every time the church met, the cars parking on the streets shut down the traffic flow and prevented people who lived in the subdivision from getting in or out of their own driveways when meetings were in session. 

At that point, neighbors complained and the preacher began to receive citations for blocking the traffic.  After months of ignoring summons to court, the police did what they do in every case of a failure to appear in court – they arrested him and he had to make bail.   

There was no persecution, the man broke the law, even though he knew he was doing it.  None of us live in a vacuum. What we do affects other people. The city government had no choice but to enforce the law. I never did the research to see how it ended, but no further calls for help in defending the minister ended up on any of the social media I keep up with. 

The implication about the “mainstream media” is that the media are all under a central committee and all news outlets must run everything printed or reported by the committee.  In cases such as the one I cited if I'm able to confirm the story by tracking it to a local paper,  it means the mainstream media did report it because that's what local papers and the television news are about. 

Even local editors must pick and choose what to report because there's always more going on than space and time will allow.  Nationally, the media goes for stories that will bolster their ratings and bring in more money.  Public demand is responsible for ongoing stories.

Is there bias in the media?  Yes, and we all know where it, and it's in the news, it's commentary. But the mainstream media consists of the reporters and columnists all across America. Thousands of people contributing small parts of a big picture.