State Rep. Richard Floyd (R-Chattanooga), the primary sponsor
of a resolution against "Sex Week" activities at the University of
Tennessee (currently in progress), was recently quoted in the Chattanooga Times as having said:
"If those people who organize this thing want to have it, hey, let them
get off campus. They can go out there in a field full of sheep if they want to
and have all the Sex Week they want."
One might think Floyd was comparing human sexuality to
bestiality if one didn't know that he is a conservative Republic with
impeccable family values and a squeaky, clean mind, above such trash talk.
Knowing these things about him, I can only assume he was advocating fresh air
and outdoor recreation and not that other thing.
"Sex Weeks at the UT-Knoxville features such serious and
timely subjects such as women's health, abstinence and the prevention of sexual
violence. On a less serious but entertaining note, there will also be an
aphrodisiac cooking class, a poetry slam, a drag show and a "Sexy Oscars
Party."
More than likely, if the organizers had called the event
something along the lines of “A Program for Abstinence Induced Procreative Good
Health and Fitness,” they would have been assured no students would show up and
the Republican conservatives would never have noticed and felt obliged to make
an issue of it.
Of course, when the word
“sex” pops up in a sentence, alarm bells go off if there is a conservative
within 15 miles.
To a group of people dedicated to the proposition that sex
education induces carnal thoughts in adolescents they would never have had
without diagrams and teachers, it's hard to let go even when those children
become adults and attend university.
Republican lawmakers are framing
the matter as a simple issue of spending public money for a program many
taxpayers find offensive. Of course, their recent nonbinding resolution that
calls Sex Week “an atrocious event” clarifies that the money to fund it is
from “student fees and grant monies.”
It is not tax revenue over which the
Legislature has control, anyway – though of late those conservative ladies and
gents have decided that the state should be able override any local
jurisdiction about just anything they please – because to paraphrase Cornelius Vanderbilt
when his lawyers told him he couldn’t legally have something he wanted. “Aint
we got the power?”
No comments:
Post a Comment